On the left we have the Spanish version of James Patterson's Swimsuit. On the right, the English edition.
First off, how come they get such a sexier title? For the sake of accuracy, both cover models appear to be wearing the swimwear known as the "bikini."
Swimsuit? That's what you wear to do water aerobics with the other old ladies. It has built in beige mesh. Bikini? Much more exciting.
Secondly, I find the Spanish cover model's bikini far more scandalous. Look how much thinner the straps are! And the patch covering her stuff? Teeny. I might even go so far as to call it Teeny Tiny. Plus, that patch isn't even visible on the English cover. You have to use your stupid imagination, and if people could use their imagination to successfully see naked women, wouldn't the porn industry be a complete failure?
The English version does have a more severely posed model, however. Her back is arched in such a way that suggests the insertion of a metal rod to replace her spine, and this is now the closest thing she gets to being reclined and relaxed.
As a substitute for the visible crotch area, the English model has a definite side breast thing happening.
Side breast for crotch area? Looks like someone was going for the classic Separate, But Equal thing here. And we all know how that ends up.
It begs the question, Why make s different cover if they're going to be so alike anyway? Who knows. Any excuse to make a model pose uncomfortable in 8 inches of tepid water, I suppose. And not to get too far off track, but if I were a lady posing for Maxim or some crap like that, I would demand to see where that water was coming from. I need to be sure that they freshened it up since the last time Kirsten Dunst was here.
No comments:
Post a Comment